Sony FX9
Sony A6000
When comparing Sony A6000 and Sony FX9, which one is better?
Neither Sony A6000 or Sony FX9 features internal raw video recording.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding internal raw video: The ability to record raw video internally is becoming more and more common in cinema cameras, and this may or may not be an advantage depending on how you shoot. While raw offers the most flexibility, it also requires more powerful editing computers, faster memory cards and more storage.
Full specifications table of Sony FX9 and Sony A6000:
Sony FX9 | Sony A6000 | |
Brand | Sony | Sony |
Weight | 4800 g | Missing |
Sensor Type | CMOS | Missing |
Internal Video Bit Depth | 10 bit | Missing |
Dynamic Range | 11.5 stopp | Missing |
Lens Mount | Sony E | Missing |
Shutter Type | Rolling Shutter | Rolling Shutter |
Storage | XQD | Missing |
Wi-Fi | Yes | Missing |
Film Camera or Still Camera | Cinema | Stills |
Digital or analog | Digital | Digital |
Sensor Readout Speed | 22.2 ms | Missing |
Internal Raw Video | Hayır | Hayır |
Stabilization | Yes | No |
Otomatik odaklama | Evet | Missing |
Built-in ND Filter | Yes | No |
Autofocus | Phase Detection Autofocus | Missing |
Sensor Format | Full Frame | Missing |
External RAW Video Recording | Yes | Missing |