Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF vs Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 (Nikon F)

Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF

Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF

Price Check ➔

Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 (Nikon F)

Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 (Nikon F)

Price Check ➔



Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF vs Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 (Nikon F)

When comparing Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 (Nikon F) and Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF, which one is better?

1. Lens Mount Comparison

The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF features a Sony E while the Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 (Nikon F) features a Nikon F Mount — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.

2. Largest Aperture Comparison

The Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 (Nikon F) has the largest aperture of the two lenses at 1.4 compared to the 2 aperture of Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF. This means that you get more light to your sensor using Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 (Nikon F) wide open, and therefore it might be a better lens in dark situations.

Winner: Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 (Nikon F)

Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.

3. Anamorphic Comparison

Neither Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 (Nikon F) or Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF are anamorphic lenses.

Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature

Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.

4. Lens Type Comparison

Both lenses are Prime lenses, which means that you can choose both Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF or Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 (Nikon F) if you're looking for that type of lens.

Winner: Tied

Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.


Specifications

Full specifications table of Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF and Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 (Nikon F):

Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 (Nikon F)
Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CFZeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 (Nikon F)

Price ➔

Price ➔

BrandZeissZeiss
Weight361 gMissing
Lens MountSony ENikon F Mount
Focal Length40 mm85 mm
Largest Aperture21.4
AnamorphicNoNo
Minimum Focus Distance24 cmMissing
TypePrimePrime
Aperture Range2 - 221.4
Filter Thread Diameter67Missing
Lens Groups8Missing
Lens Elements9Missing
Image StabilizationNoMissing
AutofocusEvetMissing
Full Frame CoverageYesMissing


Camera Verdict

This comparison of Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF and Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 (Nikon F) was last updated on December 19, 2024.