Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G vs Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS
Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G vs Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS
When comparing Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS and Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G, which one is better?
1. Lens Weight Comparison
Regarding the weight of the lenses, Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS is the winner with a weight of 1105 g compared to the 1390 g that Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G weighs.
Winner: Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS
Regarding weight: The weight of a lens is something you need to consider, since you have to carry it around on the camera as long as you're shooting. It adds to the total weight of your camera and it's important to keep the weight low if you get tired in your arms when taking photographs or filming.
2. Lens Mount Comparison
These two lenses use the same lens mount, the Sony E. This means that both lenses are compatible with cameras that use this mount.
Winner: Tied
Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.
3. Largest Aperture Comparison
The Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G has the largest aperture of the two lenses at 3.1 compared to the 4 aperture of Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS. This means that you get more light to your sensor using Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G wide open, and therefore it might be a better lens in dark situations.
Winner: Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G
Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.
4. Anamorphic Comparison
Neither Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS or Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G are anamorphic lenses.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.
5. Lens Type Comparison
Both lenses are Zoom lenses, which means that you can choose both Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G or Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS if you're looking for that type of lens.
Winner: Tied
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
6. Aperture Blade Comparison
Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G has 11 aperture blades, which makes it possible to have smoother bokeh than with the Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS that has 7 aperture blades.
Winner: Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G
Regarding aperture blades: The number of aperture blades makes a difference because the bokeh is smoother the more aperture blades the lens has. Of course, this does not mean the lens is better in other regards, but it can be an interesting aspect when deciding of a lens.
7. Stabilization Comparison
Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS features built-in image stabilization and Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G does not. Depending on your shooting style, this may be a heavy factor to choose Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS instead of Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G.
Winner: Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS
Regarding image stabilization: When a lens features built-in stabilization, it will actively help you hold the image steady by adjusting the optical elements inside the lens to compensate for movements. Do remember that lens stabilization is not required, but it may be suitable depending on your specific needs.
8. Parfocal Comparison
Both Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS and Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G are parfocal, which means that you may choose any one of them in that regard.
Winner: Tied — both have this feature
Regarding parfocal: The term "parfocal" means that the lens will keep the focus point in focus while you zoom the lens. This feature is more common in cinema lenses and more expensive photography lenses, and is not featured in all zoom lenses. It is, however, not required if you're not shooting video and zooming while filming. If you are zooming and require the focus to be kept regardless, then a parfocal lens might be worth it for you.
9. Autofocus Comparison
Both lenses have autofocus, which means that they're both great at focusing targets while taking photographs or filming video. Just remember, most cameras do not offer good autofocus while filming video.
Winner: Tied — both have this feature
Regarding autofocus: Lenses with autofocus help you focus when shooting pictures or video. If a lens only has manual focus it means that you have to focus manually by adjusting the focus wheel on the lens. Most cinema lenses do not use autofocus and are manual focus only.
10. Macro Comparison
Neither Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G or Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS are macro lenses.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding macro: Macro lenses can focus much closer to your subjects and might be suitable when photographing flowers, insects, wildlife and nature.
11. Weather Seal Comparison
Both Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G and Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS feature a weather sealed design, making them both great in that aspect.
Winner: Tied — both have this feature
Regarding weather seal: A lens that is weather sealed will perform better over time if you're using the lens in harsh conditions where it's wet or dusty. It may not matter if you're merely using your lens in a studio or in your home.
12. Full Frame Comparison
Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G covers a full frame sensor while Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS does not. If you have a full frame camera then Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G is the only choice for you in this comparison.
Winner: Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G
Regarding full frame coverage: All lenses do not cover full frame sensors, but not all cameras are full frame cameras either. If a lens covers a full frame sensor it can be used on all cameras with a matching lens mount, both full frame and crop sensors, except for medium format cameras.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G and Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS:
| Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G | Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Sony | Sony |
| Weight | 1390 g | 1105 g |
| Lens Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Focal Length | 16 - 35 mm | 18 - 110 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 3.1 | 4 |
| Anamorphic | No | No |
| Minimum Focus Distance | 28 cm | Missing |
| Type | Zoom | Zoom |
| Aperture Range | 3.1 - 25 | 4 - 22 |
| Filter Thread Diameter | Missing | 95 |
| Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread) | 114 mm | Missing |
| Aperture Blades | 11 | 7 |
| Lens Groups | 13 | 15 |
| Lens Elements | 16 | 18 |
| Image Stabilization | No | Yes |
| Parfocal | Yes | Yes |
| Autofocus | Evet | Evet |
| Macro | No | No |
| Weather Seal | Yes | Yes |
| Full Frame Coverage | Yes | No |
| Lens Hood Included | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilization Type | Missing | Sony Optical SteadyShot (OSS) |