Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR

Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro

Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro

Price Check ➔

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR

Price Check ➔



Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR

When comparing Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR and Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro, which one is better?

1. Lens Weight Comparison

Regarding the weight of the lenses, Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro is the winner with a weight of 236 g compared to the 655 g that Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR weighs.

Winner: Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro

Regarding weight: The weight of a lens is something you need to consider, since you have to carry it around on the camera as long as you're shooting. It adds to the total weight of your camera and it's important to keep the weight low if you get tired in your arms when taking photographs or filming.

2. Lens Mount Comparison

The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro features a Sony E while the Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR features a Fujifilm XF — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.

3. Largest Aperture Comparison

Both lenses share the same aperture of 2.8 — this means that you may buy both Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR in this regard; they''re the same.

Winner: Tied

Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.

4. Focus Distance Comparison

Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro features a minimum focus distance of 16 cm while Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR has a minimum focus distance of 30 cm. Depending on your shooting style, the Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro might be a better choice.

Winner: Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro

Regarding minimum focus distance: The minimum focus distance of a lens is the smallest distance from the lens to the subject you want to be in focus; subjects closer than the lens' minimum focus distance will not be in focus. Whether or not this is important to you is up for you to decide, but some want to take close photos and videos and in those cases it's important to have a lens with a low minimum focus distance.

5. Lens Type Comparison

The Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro is a Prime lens while the Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR is a Zoom lens. Whether or not a zoom lens or a prime lens is what you need, is up to you to decide; they both have their respective strengths and weaknesses.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.

6. Filter Thread Comparison

The Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro feature a filter thread diameter of 55 mm while Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR feature a diameter of 77 mm. Depending on your current gear (like other lenses or filters) one of them might be favorable over the other.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding filter thread diameter: The filter thread diameter is the size of which the lens is compatible with screw-on filters, such as CPL, ND or IR filters. If you have several lenses of a certain size, it might be a good idea to keep the same filter thread size to make sure your filters work on all your lenses. If not, then you may buy step up rings to adapt from a certain diameter to the filter thread diameter of your other lenses.

7. Aperture Blade Comparison

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR has 9 aperture blades, which makes it possible to have smoother bokeh than with the Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro that has 7 aperture blades.

Winner: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR

Regarding aperture blades: The number of aperture blades makes a difference because the bokeh is smoother the more aperture blades the lens has. Of course, this does not mean the lens is better in other regards, but it can be an interesting aspect when deciding of a lens.

8. Stabilization Comparison

Neither Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro or Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR feature built-in image stabilization.

Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature

Regarding image stabilization: When a lens features built-in stabilization, it will actively help you hold the image steady by adjusting the optical elements inside the lens to compensate for movements. Do remember that lens stabilization is not required, but it may be suitable depending on your specific needs.

9. Autofocus Comparison

Both lenses have autofocus, which means that they're both great at focusing targets while taking photographs or filming video. Just remember, most cameras do not offer good autofocus while filming video.

Winner: Tied — both have this feature

Regarding autofocus: Lenses with autofocus help you focus when shooting pictures or video. If a lens only has manual focus it means that you have to focus manually by adjusting the focus wheel on the lens. Most cinema lenses do not use autofocus and are manual focus only.

10. Macro Comparison

Res

Winner: Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro

Regarding macro: Macro lenses can focus much closer to your subjects and might be suitable when photographing flowers, insects, wildlife and nature.

11. Full Frame Comparison

Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro covers a full frame sensor while Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR does not. If you have a full frame camera then Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro is the only choice for you in this comparison.

Winner: Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro

Regarding full frame coverage: All lenses do not cover full frame sensors, but not all cameras are full frame cameras either. If a lens covers a full frame sensor it can be used on all cameras with a matching lens mount, both full frame and crop sensors, except for medium format cameras.


Specifications

Full specifications table of Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR:

Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR
Sony FE 50/2.8 MacroFujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR

Price ➔

Price ➔

BrandSonyFujifilm
Weight236 g655 g
Lens MountSony EFujifilm XF
Focal Length50 mm16 - 55 mm
Largest Aperture2.82.8
AnamorphicNoMissing
Minimum Focus Distance16 cm30 cm
TypePrimeZoom
Aperture Range2.8 - 16Missing
Filter Thread Diameter5577
Aperture Blades79
Lens Groups812
Lens Elements817
Image StabilizationNoNo
AutofocusEvetEvet
MacroYesNo
Weather SealMissingYes
Full Frame CoverageYesNo
Lens Hood IncludedNoYes


Camera Verdict

This comparison of Sony FE 50/2.8 Macro and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR was last updated on December 19, 2024.