Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS vs Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM

Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS

Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS

Price Check ➔

Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM

Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM

Price Check ➔



Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS vs Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM

When comparing Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM and Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS, which one is better?

1. Lens Weight Comparison

Regarding the weight of the lenses, Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM is the winner with a weight of 165 g compared to the 1470 g that Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS weighs.

Winner: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM

Regarding weight: The weight of a lens is something you need to consider, since you have to carry it around on the camera as long as you're shooting. It adds to the total weight of your camera and it's important to keep the weight low if you get tired in your arms when taking photographs or filming.

2. Lens Mount Comparison

The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS features a Sony E while the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM features a Canon RF — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.

3. Largest Aperture Comparison

Both lenses share the same aperture of 2.8 — this means that you may buy both Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS and Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM in this regard; they''re the same.

Winner: Tied

Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.

4. Anamorphic Comparison

Neither Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM or Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS are anamorphic lenses.

Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature

Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.

5. Focus Distance Comparison

Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM features a minimum focus distance of 13 cm while Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS has a minimum focus distance of 200 cm. Depending on your shooting style, the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM might be a better choice.

Winner: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM

Regarding minimum focus distance: The minimum focus distance of a lens is the smallest distance from the lens to the subject you want to be in focus; subjects closer than the lens' minimum focus distance will not be in focus. Whether or not this is important to you is up for you to decide, but some want to take close photos and videos and in those cases it's important to have a lens with a low minimum focus distance.

6. Lens Type Comparison

Both lenses are Prime lenses, which means that you can choose both Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS or Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM if you're looking for that type of lens.

Winner: Tied

Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.

7. Stabilization Comparison

Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS features built-in image stabilization and Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM does not. Depending on your shooting style, this may be a heavy factor to choose Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS instead of Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM.

Winner: Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS

Regarding image stabilization: When a lens features built-in stabilization, it will actively help you hold the image steady by adjusting the optical elements inside the lens to compensate for movements. Do remember that lens stabilization is not required, but it may be suitable depending on your specific needs.

8. Autofocus Comparison

Both lenses have autofocus, which means that they're both great at focusing targets while taking photographs or filming video. Just remember, most cameras do not offer good autofocus while filming video.

Winner: Tied — both have this feature

Regarding autofocus: Lenses with autofocus help you focus when shooting pictures or video. If a lens only has manual focus it means that you have to focus manually by adjusting the focus wheel on the lens. Most cinema lenses do not use autofocus and are manual focus only.

9. Macro Comparison

Neither Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS or Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM are macro lenses.

Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature

Regarding macro: Macro lenses can focus much closer to your subjects and might be suitable when photographing flowers, insects, wildlife and nature.

10. Full Frame Comparison

Both Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM and Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS cover a full frame sensor and can be used on full frame cameras as well as cameras with smaller sensors.

Winner: Tied — both have this feature

Regarding full frame coverage: All lenses do not cover full frame sensors, but not all cameras are full frame cameras either. If a lens covers a full frame sensor it can be used on all cameras with a matching lens mount, both full frame and crop sensors, except for medium format cameras.


Specifications

Full specifications table of Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS and Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM:

Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM
Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSSCanon RF 16mm F2.8 STM

Price ➔

Price ➔

BrandSonyCanon
Weight1470 g165 g
Lens MountSony ECanon RF
Focal Length300 mm16 mm
Largest Aperture2.82.8
AnamorphicNoNo
Minimum Focus Distance200 cm13 cm
TypePrimePrime
Aperture Range2.8 - 222.8 - 22
Filter Thread DiameterMissing43
Aperture Blades11Missing
Lens Groups177
Lens Elements219
Image StabilizationYesNo
AutofocusEvetEvet
MacroNoNo
Weather SealYesMissing
Full Frame CoverageYesYes
Lens Hood IncludedYesMissing
Stabilization TypeSony Optical SteadyShot (OSS)Missing


Camera Verdict

This comparison of Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS and Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM was last updated on December 19, 2024.