Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM vs Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM

Price Check ➔

Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art

Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art

Price Check ➔



Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM vs Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art

When comparing Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art and Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM, which one is better?

1. Lens Mount Comparison

The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM features a Sony E while the Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art features a Canon EF — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.

2. Largest Aperture Comparison

Both lenses share the same aperture of 2.8 — this means that you may buy both Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM and Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art in this regard; they''re the same.

Winner: Tied

Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.

3. Lens Type Comparison

The Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM is a Zoom lens while the Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art is a Prime lens. Whether or not a zoom lens or a prime lens is what you need, is up to you to decide; they both have their respective strengths and weaknesses.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.

4. Full Frame Comparison

Both Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art and Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM cover a full frame sensor and can be used on full frame cameras as well as cameras with smaller sensors.

Winner: Tied — both have this feature

Regarding full frame coverage: All lenses do not cover full frame sensors, but not all cameras are full frame cameras either. If a lens covers a full frame sensor it can be used on all cameras with a matching lens mount, both full frame and crop sensors, except for medium format cameras.


Specifications

Full specifications table of Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM and Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art:

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art
Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GMSigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art

Price ➔

Price ➔

BrandSonySigma
Weight680 gMissing
Lens MountSony ECanon EF
Focal Length16 - 35 mm70 mm
Largest Aperture2.82.8
AnamorphicNoMissing
Minimum Focus Distance28 cmMissing
TypeZoomPrime
Aperture Range2.8 - 22Missing
Filter Thread Diameter82Missing
Aperture Blades11Missing
Lens Groups13Missing
Lens Elements16Missing
AutofocusEvetMissing
MacroMissingYes
Weather SealYesMissing
Full Frame CoverageYesYes
Lens Hood IncludedYesMissing


Camera Verdict

This comparison of Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM and Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art was last updated on December 19, 2024.