SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x
Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony
When comparing Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony and SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x, which one is better?
The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x features a Micro Four Thirds while the Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony features a Sony E — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.
Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear
Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.
Both lenses share the same aperture of 2.8 — this means that you may buy both SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x and Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony in this regard; they''re the same.
Winner: Tied
Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.
Winner: SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x
Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.
Both lenses are Prime lenses, which means that you can choose both SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x or Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony if you're looking for that type of lens.
Winner: Tied
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
Neither SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x or Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony feature built-in image stabilization.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding image stabilization: When a lens features built-in stabilization, it will actively help you hold the image steady by adjusting the optical elements inside the lens to compensate for movements. Do remember that lens stabilization is not required, but it may be suitable depending on your specific needs.
In regards to autofocus, the winner is Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony since the other lens in this comparison, the SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x does not have autofocus at all — it is a manual focus lens.
Winner: Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony
Regarding autofocus: Lenses with autofocus help you focus when shooting pictures or video. If a lens only has manual focus it means that you have to focus manually by adjusting the focus wheel on the lens. Most cinema lenses do not use autofocus and are manual focus only.
Full specifications table of SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x and Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony:
SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x | Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony | |
Brand | SLR Magic | Sigma |
Weight | 1360 g | Missing |
Lens Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Focal Length | 50 mm | 105 mm |
Largest Aperture | 2.8 | 2.8 |
Anamorphic | Yes | No |
Minimum Focus Distance | 110 cm | Missing |
Type | Prime | Prime |
Filter Thread Diameter | Missing | |
Image Stabilization | No | No |
Autofocus | Hayır | Evet |
Macro | Missing | Yes |
Weather Seal | Missing | Yes |
Full Frame Coverage | Missing | Yes |