SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR

SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x

SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x

Price Check ➔

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR

Price Check ➔



SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR

When comparing Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR and SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x, which one is better?

1. Lens Weight Comparison

Regarding the weight of the lenses, Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR is the winner with a weight of 655 g compared to the 1360 g that SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x weighs.

Winner: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR

Regarding weight: The weight of a lens is something you need to consider, since you have to carry it around on the camera as long as you're shooting. It adds to the total weight of your camera and it's important to keep the weight low if you get tired in your arms when taking photographs or filming.

2. Lens Mount Comparison

The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x features a Micro Four Thirds while the Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR features a Fujifilm XF — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.

3. Largest Aperture Comparison

Both lenses share the same aperture of 2.8 — this means that you may buy both SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR in this regard; they''re the same.

Winner: Tied

Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.

4. Focus Distance Comparison

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR features a minimum focus distance of 30 cm while SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x has a minimum focus distance of 110 cm. Depending on your shooting style, the Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR might be a better choice.

Winner: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR

Regarding minimum focus distance: The minimum focus distance of a lens is the smallest distance from the lens to the subject you want to be in focus; subjects closer than the lens' minimum focus distance will not be in focus. Whether or not this is important to you is up for you to decide, but some want to take close photos and videos and in those cases it's important to have a lens with a low minimum focus distance.

5. Lens Type Comparison

The SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x is a Prime lens while the Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR is a Zoom lens. Whether or not a zoom lens or a prime lens is what you need, is up to you to decide; they both have their respective strengths and weaknesses.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.

6. Stabilization Comparison

Neither SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x or Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR feature built-in image stabilization.

Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature

Regarding image stabilization: When a lens features built-in stabilization, it will actively help you hold the image steady by adjusting the optical elements inside the lens to compensate for movements. Do remember that lens stabilization is not required, but it may be suitable depending on your specific needs.

7. Autofocus Comparison

In regards to autofocus, the winner is Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR since the other lens in this comparison, the SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x does not have autofocus at all — it is a manual focus lens.

Winner: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR

Regarding autofocus: Lenses with autofocus help you focus when shooting pictures or video. If a lens only has manual focus it means that you have to focus manually by adjusting the focus wheel on the lens. Most cinema lenses do not use autofocus and are manual focus only.


Specifications

Full specifications table of SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR:

SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR
SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2xFujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR

Price ➔

Price ➔

BrandSLR MagicFujifilm
Weight1360 g655 g
Lens MountMicro Four ThirdsFujifilm XF
Focal Length50 mm16 - 55 mm
Largest Aperture2.82.8
AnamorphicYesMissing
Minimum Focus Distance110 cm30 cm
TypePrimeZoom
Filter Thread Diameter77
Aperture BladesMissing9
Lens GroupsMissing12
Lens ElementsMissing17
Image StabilizationNoNo
AutofocusHayırEvet
MacroMissingNo
Weather SealMissingYes
Full Frame CoverageMissingNo
Lens Hood IncludedMissingYes


Camera Verdict

This comparison of SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR was last updated on December 19, 2024.