Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) vs Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art
Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) vs Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art
When comparing Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art and Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2), which one is better?
1. Largest Aperture Comparison
Both lenses share the same aperture of 2.8 — this means that you may buy both Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) and Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art in this regard; they''re the same.
Winner: Tied
Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.
2. Lens Type Comparison
The Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) is a Zoom lens while the Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art is a Prime lens. Whether or not a zoom lens or a prime lens is what you need, is up to you to decide; they both have their respective strengths and weaknesses.
Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) and Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art:
| Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) | Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Panavision | Sigma |
| Weight | 4700 g | Missing |
| Lens Mount | Missing | Canon EF |
| Focal Length | 40 - 80 mm | 70 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| Anamorphic | Yes | Missing |
| Anamorphic Squeeze Factor | 2 | Missing |
| Minimum Focus Distance | 99.1 cm | Missing |
| Type | Zoom | Prime |
| Macro | Missing | Yes |
| Full Frame Coverage | Missing | Yes |