Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art vs Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II

Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art

Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art

Price Check ➔

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II

Price Check ➔



Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art vs Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II

When comparing Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II and Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art, which one is better?

1. Lens Mount Comparison

These two lenses use the same lens mount, the Canon EF. This means that both lenses are compatible with cameras that use this mount.

Winner: Tied

Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.

2. Largest Aperture Comparison

The Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art has the largest aperture of the two lenses at 2.8 compared to the 3.5 - 5.6 aperture of Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II. This means that you get more light to your sensor using Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art wide open, and therefore it might be a better lens in dark situations.

Winner: Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art

Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.

3. Lens Type Comparison

The Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art is a Prime lens while the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II is a Zoom lens. Whether or not a zoom lens or a prime lens is what you need, is up to you to decide; they both have their respective strengths and weaknesses.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.

4. Full Frame Comparison

Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art covers a full frame sensor while Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II does not. If you have a full frame camera then Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art is the only choice for you in this comparison.

Winner: Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art

Regarding full frame coverage: All lenses do not cover full frame sensors, but not all cameras are full frame cameras either. If a lens covers a full frame sensor it can be used on all cameras with a matching lens mount, both full frame and crop sensors, except for medium format cameras.


Specifications

Full specifications table of Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art and Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II:

Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II
Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro ArtCanon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II

Price ➔

Price ➔

BrandSigmaCanon
WeightMissing200 g
Lens MountCanon EFCanon EF
Focal Length70 mm18 - 55 mm
Largest Aperture2.83.5 - 5.6
AnamorphicMissingNo
Minimum Focus DistanceMissing25 cm
TypePrimeZoom
Filter Thread DiameterMissing58
Lens GroupsMissing9
Lens ElementsMissing11
Image StabilizationMissingYes
AutofocusMissingEvet
MacroYesMissing
Weather SealMissingNo
Full Frame CoverageYesNo
Lens Hood IncludedMissingNo
Stabilization TypeMissingCanon Image Stabilizer (IS)


Camera Verdict

This comparison of Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art and Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II was last updated on December 19, 2024.