Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Art Canon EF vs Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon

Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Art Canon EF

Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Art Canon EF

Price Check ➔

Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon

Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon

Price Check ➔



Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Art Canon EF vs Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon

When comparing Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon and Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Art Canon EF, which one is better?

1. Lens Mount Comparison

These two lenses use the same lens mount, the Canon EF. This means that both lenses are compatible with cameras that use this mount.

Winner: Tied

Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.

2. Largest Aperture Comparison

The Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon has the largest aperture of the two lenses at 1.8 compared to the 2.8 aperture of Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Art - Canon EF. This means that you get more light to your sensor using Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon wide open, and therefore it might be a better lens in dark situations.

Winner: Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon

Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.

3. Anamorphic Comparison

Neither Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon or Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Art - Canon EF are anamorphic lenses.

Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature

Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.

4. Lens Type Comparison

The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Art - Canon EF is a Zoom lens while the Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon is a Prime lens. Whether or not a zoom lens or a prime lens is what you need, is up to you to decide; they both have their respective strengths and weaknesses.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.

5. Autofocus Comparison

Both lenses have autofocus, which means that they're both great at focusing targets while taking photographs or filming video. Just remember, most cameras do not offer good autofocus while filming video.

Winner: Tied — both have this feature

Regarding autofocus: Lenses with autofocus help you focus when shooting pictures or video. If a lens only has manual focus it means that you have to focus manually by adjusting the focus wheel on the lens. Most cinema lenses do not use autofocus and are manual focus only.


Specifications

Full specifications table of Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Art Canon EF and Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon:

Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Art - Canon EF Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon
Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Art - Canon EFSigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon

Price ➔

Price ➔

BrandSigmaSigma
Weight1020 gMissing
Lens MountCanon EFCanon EF
Focal Length24 - 70 mm135 mm
Largest Aperture2.81.8
AnamorphicNoNo
TypeZoomPrime
Image StabilizationNoMissing
ParfocalYesMissing
AutofocusEvetEvet


Camera Verdict

This comparison of Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Art - Canon EF and Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon was last updated on December 19, 2024.