Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony vs Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary Fuji XF
Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony vs Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary Fuji XF
When comparing Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary Fuji XF and Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony, which one is better?
1. Lens Weight Comparison
Regarding the weight of the lenses, Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary - Fuji XF is the winner with a weight of 290 g compared to the 1130 g that Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony weighs.
Winner: Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary Fuji XF
Regarding weight: The weight of a lens is something you need to consider, since you have to carry it around on the camera as long as you're shooting. It adds to the total weight of your camera and it's important to keep the weight low if you get tired in your arms when taking photographs or filming.
2. Lens Mount Comparison
The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony features a Sony E while the Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary - Fuji XF features a Fujifilm XF — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.
Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear
Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.
3. Largest Aperture Comparison
The Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony has the largest aperture of the two lenses at 1.8 compared to the 2.8 aperture of Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary - Fuji XF. This means that you get more light to your sensor using Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony wide open, and therefore it might be a better lens in dark situations.
Winner: Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony
Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.
4. Anamorphic Comparison
Neither Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary - Fuji XF or Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony are anamorphic lenses.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.
5. Focus Distance Comparison
Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary - Fuji XF features a minimum focus distance of 12 cm while Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony has a minimum focus distance of 87.5 cm. Depending on your shooting style, the Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary - Fuji XF might be a better choice.
Winner: Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary Fuji XF
Regarding minimum focus distance: The minimum focus distance of a lens is the smallest distance from the lens to the subject you want to be in focus; subjects closer than the lens' minimum focus distance will not be in focus. Whether or not this is important to you is up for you to decide, but some want to take close photos and videos and in those cases it's important to have a lens with a low minimum focus distance.
6. Lens Type Comparison
The Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony is a Prime lens while the Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary - Fuji XF is a Zoom lens. Whether or not a zoom lens or a prime lens is what you need, is up to you to decide; they both have their respective strengths and weaknesses.
Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
7. Stabilization Comparison
Neither Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony or Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary - Fuji XF feature built-in image stabilization.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding image stabilization: When a lens features built-in stabilization, it will actively help you hold the image steady by adjusting the optical elements inside the lens to compensate for movements. Do remember that lens stabilization is not required, but it may be suitable depending on your specific needs.
8. Autofocus Comparison
Both lenses have autofocus, which means that they're both great at focusing targets while taking photographs or filming video. Just remember, most cameras do not offer good autofocus while filming video.
Winner: Tied — both have this feature
Regarding autofocus: Lenses with autofocus help you focus when shooting pictures or video. If a lens only has manual focus it means that you have to focus manually by adjusting the focus wheel on the lens. Most cinema lenses do not use autofocus and are manual focus only.
9. Full Frame Comparison
Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony covers a full frame sensor while Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary - Fuji XF does not. If you have a full frame camera then Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony is the only choice for you in this comparison.
Winner: Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony
Regarding full frame coverage: All lenses do not cover full frame sensors, but not all cameras are full frame cameras either. If a lens covers a full frame sensor it can be used on all cameras with a matching lens mount, both full frame and crop sensors, except for medium format cameras.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony and Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary Fuji XF:
| Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony | Sigma 18-50mm f/2,8 DC DN Contemporary - Fuji XF | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Sigma | Sigma |
| Weight | 1130 g | 290 g |
| Lens Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm XF |
| Focal Length | 135 mm | 18 - 50 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 1.8 | 2.8 |
| Anamorphic | No | No |
| Minimum Focus Distance | 87.5 cm | 12 cm |
| Type | Prime | Zoom |
| Aperture Range | Missing | 2.8 - 22 |
| Filter Thread Diameter | Missing | 55 |
| Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread) | Missing | 7 mm |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | Missing |
| Lens Groups | 10 | 10 |
| Lens Elements | 13 | 13 |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Autofocus | Evet | Evet |
| Macro | No | Missing |
| Weather Seal | Yes | Missing |
| Full Frame Coverage | Yes | No |
| Lens Hood Included | Yes | Missing |