Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA
Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony
When comparing Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony and Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA, which one is better?
Regarding the weight of the lenses, Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA is the winner with a weight of 281 g compared to the 1130 g that Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony weighs.
Winner: Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA
Regarding weight: The weight of a lens is something you need to consider, since you have to carry it around on the camera as long as you're shooting. It adds to the total weight of your camera and it's important to keep the weight low if you get tired in your arms when taking photographs or filming.
These two lenses use the same lens mount, the Sony E. This means that both lenses are compatible with cameras that use this mount.
Winner: Tied
Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.
Both lenses share the same aperture of 1.8 — this means that you may buy both Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA and Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony in this regard; they''re the same.
Winner: Tied
Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.
Neither Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony or Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA are anamorphic lenses.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.
Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA features a minimum focus distance of 50 cm while Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony has a minimum focus distance of 87.5 cm. Depending on your shooting style, the Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA might be a better choice.
Winner: Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA
Regarding minimum focus distance: The minimum focus distance of a lens is the smallest distance from the lens to the subject you want to be in focus; subjects closer than the lens' minimum focus distance will not be in focus. Whether or not this is important to you is up for you to decide, but some want to take close photos and videos and in those cases it's important to have a lens with a low minimum focus distance.
Both lenses are Prime lenses, which means that you can choose both Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA or Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony if you're looking for that type of lens.
Winner: Tied
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
Both Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA and Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony have 9 aperture blades, which means they should both have a similar bokeh shape and roundness.
Winner: Tied
Regarding aperture blades: The number of aperture blades makes a difference because the bokeh is smoother the more aperture blades the lens has. Of course, this does not mean the lens is better in other regards, but it can be an interesting aspect when deciding of a lens.
Full specifications table of Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA and Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Sony:
Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA | Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM - Sony | |
Brand | Zeiss | Sigma |
Weight | 281 g | 1130 g |
Lens Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
Focal Length | 55 mm | 135 mm |
Largest Aperture | 1.8 | 1.8 |
Anamorphic | No | No |
Minimum Focus Distance | 50 cm | 87.5 cm |
Type | Prime | Prime |
Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread) | 49 mm | Missing |
Aperture Blades | 9 | 9 |
Lens Groups | Missing | 10 |
Lens Elements | Missing | 13 |
Image Stabilization | Missing | No |
Autofocus | Missing | Evet |
Macro | Missing | No |
Weather Seal | Missing | Yes |
Full Frame Coverage | Missing | Yes |
Lens Hood Included | Missing | Yes |