Sigma 65mm F2 DG DN (Sony E Mount) vs Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon
Sigma 65mm F2 DG DN (Sony E Mount) vs Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon
When comparing Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon and Sigma 65mm F2 DG DN (Sony E Mount), which one is better?
1. Lens Mount Comparison
The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Sigma 65mm F2 DG DN (Sony E Mount) features a Sony E while the Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon features a Canon EF — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.
Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear
Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.
2. Anamorphic Comparison
Neither Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon or Sigma 65mm F2 DG DN (Sony E Mount) are anamorphic lenses.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Sigma 65mm F2 DG DN (Sony E Mount) and Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon:
| Sigma 65mm F2 DG DN (Sony E Mount) | Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Sigma | Sigma |
| Lens Mount | Sony E | Canon EF |
| Focal Length | Missing | 135 mm |
| Largest Aperture | Missing | 1.8 |
| Anamorphic | No | No |
| Type | Missing | Prime |
| Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread) | 62 mm | Missing |
| Autofocus | Missing | Evet |