Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon vs Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony
Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon vs Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony
When comparing Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony and Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon, which one is better?
1. Lens Mount Comparison
The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon features a Canon EF while the Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony features a Sony E — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.
Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear
Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.
2. Largest Aperture Comparison
The Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon has the largest aperture of the two lenses at 1.8 compared to the 2.8 aperture of Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony. This means that you get more light to your sensor using Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon wide open, and therefore it might be a better lens in dark situations.
Winner: Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon
Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.
3. Anamorphic Comparison
Neither Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony or Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon are anamorphic lenses.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.
4. Lens Type Comparison
Both lenses are Prime lenses, which means that you can choose both Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon or Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony if you're looking for that type of lens.
Winner: Tied
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
5. Autofocus Comparison
Both lenses have autofocus, which means that they're both great at focusing targets while taking photographs or filming video. Just remember, most cameras do not offer good autofocus while filming video.
Winner: Tied — both have this feature
Regarding autofocus: Lenses with autofocus help you focus when shooting pictures or video. If a lens only has manual focus it means that you have to focus manually by adjusting the focus wheel on the lens. Most cinema lenses do not use autofocus and are manual focus only.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art Canon and Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony:
| Sigma 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art - Canon | Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Sigma | Sigma |
| Lens Mount | Canon EF | Sony E |
| Focal Length | 135 mm | 105 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 1.8 | 2.8 |
| Anamorphic | No | No |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Image Stabilization | Missing | No |
| Autofocus | Evet | Evet |
| Macro | Missing | Yes |
| Weather Seal | Missing | Yes |
| Full Frame Coverage | Missing | Yes |