Sigma 35/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon EF) vs Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony
Sigma 35/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon EF) vs Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony
When comparing Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony and Sigma 35/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon EF), which one is better?
1. Lens Mount Comparison
The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art - (Canon EF) features a Canon EF while the Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony features a Sony E — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.
Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear
Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.
2. Largest Aperture Comparison
The Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art - (Canon EF) has the largest aperture of the two lenses at 1.4 compared to the 2.8 aperture of Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony. This means that you get more light to your sensor using Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art - (Canon EF) wide open, and therefore it might be a better lens in dark situations.
Winner: Sigma 35/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon EF)
Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.
3. Anamorphic Comparison
Neither Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony or Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art - (Canon EF) are anamorphic lenses.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.
4. Lens Type Comparison
Both lenses are Prime lenses, which means that you can choose both Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art - (Canon EF) or Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony if you're looking for that type of lens.
Winner: Tied
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
5. Stabilization Comparison
Neither Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art - (Canon EF) or Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony feature built-in image stabilization.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding image stabilization: When a lens features built-in stabilization, it will actively help you hold the image steady by adjusting the optical elements inside the lens to compensate for movements. Do remember that lens stabilization is not required, but it may be suitable depending on your specific needs.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Sigma 35/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon EF) and Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony:
| Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art - (Canon EF) | Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Sigma | Sigma |
| Weight | 665 g | Missing |
| Lens Mount | Canon EF | Sony E |
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 105 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 1.4 | 2.8 |
| Anamorphic | No | No |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Autofocus | Missing | Evet |
| Macro | Missing | Yes |
| Weather Seal | Missing | Yes |
| Full Frame Coverage | Missing | Yes |