Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR
Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR
When comparing Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR and Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony, which one is better?
1. Lens Mount Comparison
The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony features a Sony E while the Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR features a Fujifilm XF — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.
Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear
Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.
2. Largest Aperture Comparison
Both lenses share the same aperture of 2.8 — this means that you may buy both Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR in this regard; they''re the same.
Winner: Tied
Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.
3. Lens Type Comparison
The Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony is a Prime lens while the Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR is a Zoom lens. Whether or not a zoom lens or a prime lens is what you need, is up to you to decide; they both have their respective strengths and weaknesses.
Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
4. Stabilization Comparison
Neither Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony or Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR feature built-in image stabilization.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding image stabilization: When a lens features built-in stabilization, it will actively help you hold the image steady by adjusting the optical elements inside the lens to compensate for movements. Do remember that lens stabilization is not required, but it may be suitable depending on your specific needs.
5. Autofocus Comparison
Both lenses have autofocus, which means that they're both great at focusing targets while taking photographs or filming video. Just remember, most cameras do not offer good autofocus while filming video.
Winner: Tied — both have this feature
Regarding autofocus: Lenses with autofocus help you focus when shooting pictures or video. If a lens only has manual focus it means that you have to focus manually by adjusting the focus wheel on the lens. Most cinema lenses do not use autofocus and are manual focus only.
6. Macro Comparison
Res
Winner: Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony
Regarding macro: Macro lenses can focus much closer to your subjects and might be suitable when photographing flowers, insects, wildlife and nature.
7. Weather Seal Comparison
Both Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR feature a weather sealed design, making them both great in that aspect.
Winner: Tied — both have this feature
Regarding weather seal: A lens that is weather sealed will perform better over time if you're using the lens in harsh conditions where it's wet or dusty. It may not matter if you're merely using your lens in a studio or in your home.
8. Full Frame Comparison
Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony covers a full frame sensor while Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR does not. If you have a full frame camera then Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony is the only choice for you in this comparison.
Winner: Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony
Regarding full frame coverage: All lenses do not cover full frame sensors, but not all cameras are full frame cameras either. If a lens covers a full frame sensor it can be used on all cameras with a matching lens mount, both full frame and crop sensors, except for medium format cameras.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art Sony and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR:
| Sigma 105/2,8 DG DN Macro Art - Sony | Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2,8 R LM WR | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Sigma | Fujifilm |
| Weight | Missing | 655 g |
| Lens Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm XF |
| Focal Length | 105 mm | 16 - 55 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| Anamorphic | No | Missing |
| Minimum Focus Distance | Missing | 30 cm |
| Type | Prime | Zoom |
| Filter Thread Diameter | Missing | 77 |
| Aperture Blades | Missing | 9 |
| Lens Groups | Missing | 12 |
| Lens Elements | Missing | 17 |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Autofocus | Evet | Evet |
| Macro | Yes | No |
| Weather Seal | Yes | Yes |
| Full Frame Coverage | Yes | No |
| Lens Hood Included | Missing | Yes |