Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) vs SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x
Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) vs SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x
When comparing SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x and Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2), which one is better?
1. Lens Weight Comparison
Regarding the weight of the lenses, SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x is the winner with a weight of 1360 g compared to the 4700 g that Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) weighs.
Winner: SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x
Regarding weight: The weight of a lens is something you need to consider, since you have to carry it around on the camera as long as you're shooting. It adds to the total weight of your camera and it's important to keep the weight low if you get tired in your arms when taking photographs or filming.
2. Largest Aperture Comparison
Both lenses share the same aperture of 2.8 — this means that you may buy both Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) and SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x in this regard; they''re the same.
Winner: Tied
Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.
3. Anamorphic Comparison
Both SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x and Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) are anamorphic lenses.
Winner: Tied — both have this feature
Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.
4. Focus Distance Comparison
Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) features a minimum focus distance of 99.1 cm while SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x has a minimum focus distance of 110 cm. Depending on your shooting style, the Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) might be a better choice.
Winner: Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2)
Regarding minimum focus distance: The minimum focus distance of a lens is the smallest distance from the lens to the subject you want to be in focus; subjects closer than the lens' minimum focus distance will not be in focus. Whether or not this is important to you is up for you to decide, but some want to take close photos and videos and in those cases it's important to have a lens with a low minimum focus distance.
5. Lens Type Comparison
The Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) is a Zoom lens while the SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x is a Prime lens. Whether or not a zoom lens or a prime lens is what you need, is up to you to decide; they both have their respective strengths and weaknesses.
Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) and SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x:
| Panavision AWZ2 (Anamorphic Wide Zoom 2) | SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Panavision | SLR Magic |
| Weight | 4700 g | 1360 g |
| Lens Mount | Missing | Micro Four Thirds |
| Focal Length | 40 - 80 mm | 50 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| Anamorphic | Yes | Yes |
| Anamorphic Squeeze Factor | 2 | Missing |
| Minimum Focus Distance | 99.1 cm | 110 cm |
| Type | Zoom | Prime |
| Filter Thread Diameter | Missing | |
| Image Stabilization | Missing | No |
| Autofocus | Missing | Hayır |