SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x vs Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 Pro
SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x vs Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 Pro
When comparing Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 Pro and SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x, which one is better?
1. Lens Weight Comparison
Regarding the weight of the lenses, Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 Pro is the winner with a weight of 410 g compared to the 1360 g that SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x weighs.
Winner: Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 Pro
Regarding weight: The weight of a lens is something you need to consider, since you have to carry it around on the camera as long as you're shooting. It adds to the total weight of your camera and it's important to keep the weight low if you get tired in your arms when taking photographs or filming.
2. Lens Mount Comparison
These two lenses use the same lens mount, the Micro Four Thirds. This means that both lenses are compatible with cameras that use this mount.
Winner: Tied
Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.
3. Largest Aperture Comparison
The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 Pro has the largest aperture of the two lenses at 1.2 compared to the 2.8 aperture of SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x. This means that you get more light to your sensor using Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 Pro wide open, and therefore it might be a better lens in dark situations.
Winner: Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 Pro
Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.
4. Anamorphic Comparison
Winner: SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x
Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.
5. Focus Distance Comparison
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 Pro features a minimum focus distance of 30 cm while SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x has a minimum focus distance of 110 cm. Depending on your shooting style, the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 Pro might be a better choice.
Winner: Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 Pro
Regarding minimum focus distance: The minimum focus distance of a lens is the smallest distance from the lens to the subject you want to be in focus; subjects closer than the lens' minimum focus distance will not be in focus. Whether or not this is important to you is up for you to decide, but some want to take close photos and videos and in those cases it's important to have a lens with a low minimum focus distance.
6. Lens Type Comparison
Both lenses are Prime lenses, which means that you can choose both SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x or Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 Pro if you're looking for that type of lens.
Winner: Tied
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
Specifications
Full specifications table of SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x and Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 Pro:
| SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 Pro | |
 |  | |
| Brand | SLR Magic | Olympus |
| Weight | 1360 g | 410 g |
| Lens Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Focal Length | 50 mm | 25 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2.8 | 1.2 |
| Anamorphic | Yes | No |
| Minimum Focus Distance | 110 cm | 30 cm |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Aperture Range | Missing | 1.2 - 16 |
| Filter Thread Diameter | Missing | |
| Aperture Blades | Missing | 9 |
| Lens Groups | Missing | 14 |
| Lens Elements | Missing | 19 |
| Image Stabilization | No | Missing |
| Autofocus | Hayır | Missing |