SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x vs Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro
SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x vs Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro
When comparing Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro and SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x, which one is better?
1. Lens Weight Comparison
Regarding the weight of the lenses, Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro is the winner with a weight of 195 g compared to the 1360 g that SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x weighs.
Winner: Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro
Regarding weight: The weight of a lens is something you need to consider, since you have to carry it around on the camera as long as you're shooting. It adds to the total weight of your camera and it's important to keep the weight low if you get tired in your arms when taking photographs or filming.
2. Lens Mount Comparison
The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x features a Micro Four Thirds while the Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro features a Fujifilm XF — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.
Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear
Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.
3. Largest Aperture Comparison
Both lenses share the same aperture of 2.8 — this means that you may buy both SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x and Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro in this regard; they''re the same.
Winner: Tied
Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.
4. Focus Distance Comparison
Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro features a minimum focus distance of 10 cm while SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x has a minimum focus distance of 110 cm. Depending on your shooting style, the Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro might be a better choice.
Winner: Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro
Regarding minimum focus distance: The minimum focus distance of a lens is the smallest distance from the lens to the subject you want to be in focus; subjects closer than the lens' minimum focus distance will not be in focus. Whether or not this is important to you is up for you to decide, but some want to take close photos and videos and in those cases it's important to have a lens with a low minimum focus distance.
5. Lens Type Comparison
Both lenses are Prime lenses, which means that you can choose both SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x or Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro if you're looking for that type of lens.
Winner: Tied
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
Specifications
Full specifications table of SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x and Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro:
| SLR Magic Anamorphot-CINE 50mm T2.8 2x | Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro | |
 |  | |
| Brand | SLR Magic | Fujifilm |
| Weight | 1360 g | 195 g |
| Lens Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Fujifilm XF |
| Focal Length | 50 mm | 30 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| Anamorphic | Yes | Missing |
| Minimum Focus Distance | 110 cm | 10 cm |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Filter Thread Diameter | 43 | |
| Image Stabilization | No | Missing |
| Autofocus | Hayır | Missing |
| Macro | Missing | Yes |
| Weather Seal | Missing | Yes |
| Full Frame Coverage | Missing | No |