Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM vs Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro

Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM

Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM

Price Check ➔

Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro

Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro

Price Check ➔



Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM vs Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro

When comparing Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro and Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM, which one is better?

1. Lens Weight Comparison

Regarding the weight of the lenses, Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM is the winner with a weight of 165 g compared to the 195 g that Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro weighs.

Winner: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM

Regarding weight: The weight of a lens is something you need to consider, since you have to carry it around on the camera as long as you're shooting. It adds to the total weight of your camera and it's important to keep the weight low if you get tired in your arms when taking photographs or filming.

2. Lens Mount Comparison

The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM features a Canon RF while the Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro features a Fujifilm XF — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.

3. Largest Aperture Comparison

Both lenses share the same aperture of 2.8 — this means that you may buy both Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM and Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro in this regard; they''re the same.

Winner: Tied

Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.

4. Focus Distance Comparison

Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro features a minimum focus distance of 10 cm while Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM has a minimum focus distance of 13 cm. Depending on your shooting style, the Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro might be a better choice.

Winner: Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro

Regarding minimum focus distance: The minimum focus distance of a lens is the smallest distance from the lens to the subject you want to be in focus; subjects closer than the lens' minimum focus distance will not be in focus. Whether or not this is important to you is up for you to decide, but some want to take close photos and videos and in those cases it's important to have a lens with a low minimum focus distance.

5. Lens Type Comparison

Both lenses are Prime lenses, which means that you can choose both Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM or Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro if you're looking for that type of lens.

Winner: Tied

Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.

6. Filter Thread Comparison



Winner: Tied

Regarding filter thread diameter: The filter thread diameter is the size of which the lens is compatible with screw-on filters, such as CPL, ND or IR filters. If you have several lenses of a certain size, it might be a good idea to keep the same filter thread size to make sure your filters work on all your lenses. If not, then you may buy step up rings to adapt from a certain diameter to the filter thread diameter of your other lenses.

7. Macro Comparison

Res

Winner: Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro

Regarding macro: Macro lenses can focus much closer to your subjects and might be suitable when photographing flowers, insects, wildlife and nature.

8. Full Frame Comparison

Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM covers a full frame sensor while Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro does not. If you have a full frame camera then Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM is the only choice for you in this comparison.

Winner: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM

Regarding full frame coverage: All lenses do not cover full frame sensors, but not all cameras are full frame cameras either. If a lens covers a full frame sensor it can be used on all cameras with a matching lens mount, both full frame and crop sensors, except for medium format cameras.


Specifications

Full specifications table of Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM and Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro:

Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro
Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STMFujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro

Price ➔

Price ➔

BrandCanonFujifilm
Weight165 g195 g
Lens MountCanon RFFujifilm XF
Focal Length16 mm30 mm
Largest Aperture2.82.8
AnamorphicNoMissing
Minimum Focus Distance13 cm10 cm
TypePrimePrime
Aperture Range2.8 - 22Missing
Filter Thread Diameter4343
Lens Groups7Missing
Lens Elements9Missing
Image StabilizationNoMissing
AutofocusEvetMissing
MacroNoYes
Weather SealMissingYes
Full Frame CoverageYesNo


Camera Verdict

This comparison of Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM and Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR Macro was last updated on December 19, 2024.