Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR

Price Check ➔

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR

Price Check ➔



Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR

When comparing Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR, which one is better?

1. Lens Weight Comparison

Regarding the weight of the lenses, Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR is the winner with a weight of 360 g compared to the 445 g that Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR weighs.

Winner: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR

Regarding weight: The weight of a lens is something you need to consider, since you have to carry it around on the camera as long as you're shooting. It adds to the total weight of your camera and it's important to keep the weight low if you get tired in your arms when taking photographs or filming.

2. Lens Mount Comparison

These two lenses use the same lens mount, the Fujifilm XF. This means that both lenses are compatible with cameras that use this mount.

Winner: Tied

Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.

3. Largest Aperture Comparison

The Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR has the largest aperture of the two lenses at 1.2 compared to the 1.4 aperture of Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR. This means that you get more light to your sensor using Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR wide open, and therefore it might be a better lens in dark situations.

Winner: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR

Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.

4. Anamorphic Comparison

Neither Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR or Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR are anamorphic lenses.

Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature

Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.

5. Focus Distance Comparison

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR features a minimum focus distance of 30 cm while Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR has a minimum focus distance of 50 cm. Depending on your shooting style, the Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR might be a better choice.

Winner: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR

Regarding minimum focus distance: The minimum focus distance of a lens is the smallest distance from the lens to the subject you want to be in focus; subjects closer than the lens' minimum focus distance will not be in focus. Whether or not this is important to you is up for you to decide, but some want to take close photos and videos and in those cases it's important to have a lens with a low minimum focus distance.

6. Lens Type Comparison

Both lenses are Prime lenses, which means that you can choose both Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR or Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR if you're looking for that type of lens.

Winner: Tied

Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.

7. Filter Thread Comparison

The Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR feature a filter thread diameter of 58 mm while Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR feature a diameter of 67 mm. Depending on your current gear (like other lenses or filters) one of them might be favorable over the other.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding filter thread diameter: The filter thread diameter is the size of which the lens is compatible with screw-on filters, such as CPL, ND or IR filters. If you have several lenses of a certain size, it might be a good idea to keep the same filter thread size to make sure your filters work on all your lenses. If not, then you may buy step up rings to adapt from a certain diameter to the filter thread diameter of your other lenses.

8. Aperture Blade Comparison

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR has 11 aperture blades, which makes it possible to have smoother bokeh than with the Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR that has 9 aperture blades.

Winner: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR

Regarding aperture blades: The number of aperture blades makes a difference because the bokeh is smoother the more aperture blades the lens has. Of course, this does not mean the lens is better in other regards, but it can be an interesting aspect when deciding of a lens.

9. Autofocus Comparison

Both lenses have autofocus, which means that they're both great at focusing targets while taking photographs or filming video. Just remember, most cameras do not offer good autofocus while filming video.

Winner: Tied — both have this feature

Regarding autofocus: Lenses with autofocus help you focus when shooting pictures or video. If a lens only has manual focus it means that you have to focus manually by adjusting the focus wheel on the lens. Most cinema lenses do not use autofocus and are manual focus only.

10. Weather Seal Comparison

Both Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR feature a weather sealed design, making them both great in that aspect.

Winner: Tied — both have this feature

Regarding weather seal: A lens that is weather sealed will perform better over time if you're using the lens in harsh conditions where it's wet or dusty. It may not matter if you're merely using your lens in a studio or in your home.

11. Full Frame Comparison

Neither Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR or Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR cover a full frame sensor, which means that if you have a full frame camera, neither lens will be compatible with your camera.

Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature

Regarding full frame coverage: All lenses do not cover full frame sensors, but not all cameras are full frame cameras either. If a lens covers a full frame sensor it can be used on all cameras with a matching lens mount, both full frame and crop sensors, except for medium format cameras.


Specifications

Full specifications table of Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR:

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR
Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WRFujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR

Price ➔

Price ➔

BrandFujifilmFujifilm
Weight360 g445 g
Lens MountFujifilm XFFujifilm XF
Focal Length33 mm56 mm
Largest Aperture1.41.2
AnamorphicNoNo
Minimum Focus Distance30 cm50 cm
TypePrimePrime
Aperture Range1.4 - 16Missing
Filter Thread Diameter5867
Aperture Blades911
Lens Groups108
Lens Elements1513
Image StabilizationMissingNo
AutofocusEvetEvet
MacroNoMissing
Weather SealYesYes
Full Frame CoverageNoNo
Lens Hood IncludedYesMissing


Camera Verdict

This comparison of Fujifilm Fujinon XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm f/1,2 R WR was last updated on December 19, 2024.