Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR
Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR
When comparing Fujifilm Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR and Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x, which one is better?
1. Lens Mount Comparison
The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x features a Arri PL Mount while the Fujifilm Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR features a Fujifilm XF — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.
Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear
Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.
2. Largest Aperture Comparison
Both lenses share the same aperture of 2 — this means that you may buy both Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR in this regard; they''re the same.
Winner: Tied
Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.
3. Anamorphic Comparison
Winner: Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x
Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.
4. Lens Type Comparison
Both lenses are Prime lenses, which means that you can choose both Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x or Fujifilm Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR if you're looking for that type of lens.
Winner: Tied
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
5. Autofocus Comparison
In regards to autofocus, the winner is Fujifilm Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR since the other lens in this comparison, the Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x does not have autofocus at all — it is a manual focus lens.
Winner: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR
Regarding autofocus: Lenses with autofocus help you focus when shooting pictures or video. If a lens only has manual focus it means that you have to focus manually by adjusting the focus wheel on the lens. Most cinema lenses do not use autofocus and are manual focus only.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR:
| Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x | Fujifilm Fujinon XF 23mm f/2 R WR | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Atlas Lens Co. | Fujifilm |
| Weight | Missing | 180 g |
| Lens Mount | Arri PL Mount | Fujifilm XF |
| Focal Length | 25 mm | 23 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2 | 2 |
| Anamorphic | Yes | No |
| Anamorphic Squeeze Factor | 2 | Missing |
| Minimum Focus Distance | Missing | 22 cm |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Aperture Range | Missing | 2 - 16 |
| Filter Thread Diameter | Missing | 43 |
| Aperture Blades | Missing | 9 |
| Lens Groups | Missing | 6 |
| Lens Elements | Missing | 10 |
| Image Stabilization | No | Missing |
| Autofocus | Hayır | Evet |
| Macro | No | Missing |
| Weather Seal | No | Missing |
| Lens Hood Included | Missing | Yes |