Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 vs Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1

Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8

Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8

Price Check ➔

Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1

Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1

Price Check ➔



Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 vs Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1

When comparing Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 and Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8, which one is better?

1. Lens Weight Comparison

Regarding the weight of the lenses, Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 is the winner with a weight of 2000 g compared to the 10300 g that Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 weighs.

Winner: Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8

Regarding weight: The weight of a lens is something you need to consider, since you have to carry it around on the camera as long as you're shooting. It adds to the total weight of your camera and it's important to keep the weight low if you get tired in your arms when taking photographs or filming.

2. Largest Aperture Comparison

The Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 has the largest aperture of the two lenses at 2.8 compared to the 3.1 aperture of Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1. This means that you get more light to your sensor using Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 wide open, and therefore it might be a better lens in dark situations.

Winner: Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8

Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.

3. Focus Distance Comparison

Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 features a minimum focus distance of 35 cm while Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 has a minimum focus distance of 72 cm. Depending on your shooting style, the Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 might be a better choice.

Winner: Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8

Regarding minimum focus distance: The minimum focus distance of a lens is the smallest distance from the lens to the subject you want to be in focus; subjects closer than the lens' minimum focus distance will not be in focus. Whether or not this is important to you is up for you to decide, but some want to take close photos and videos and in those cases it's important to have a lens with a low minimum focus distance.

4. Lens Type Comparison

The Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 is a Prime lens while the Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 is a Zoom lens. Whether or not a zoom lens or a prime lens is what you need, is up to you to decide; they both have their respective strengths and weaknesses.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.


Specifications

Full specifications table of Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 and Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1:

Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1
Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1

Price ➔

Price ➔

BrandZeissCooke
Weight2000 g10300 g
Lens MountMissing
Focal Length8 mm35 - 140 mm
Largest Aperture2.83.1
AnamorphicMissingYes
Anamorphic Squeeze FactorMissing2
Minimum Focus Distance35 cm72 cm
TypePrimeZoom
Aperture Range2.8 - 223.1 - 22
Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread)134 mmMissing


Camera Verdict

This comparison of Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 and Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 was last updated on December 19, 2024.