Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 vs Panavision Primo SL10
Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 vs Panavision Primo SL10
When comparing Panavision Primo SL10 and Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1, which one is better?
1. Lens Weight Comparison
Regarding the weight of the lenses, Panavision Primo SL10 is the winner with a weight of 3000 g compared to the 10300 g that Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 weighs.
Winner: Panavision Primo SL10
Regarding weight: The weight of a lens is something you need to consider, since you have to carry it around on the camera as long as you're shooting. It adds to the total weight of your camera and it's important to keep the weight low if you get tired in your arms when taking photographs or filming.
2. Largest Aperture Comparison
The Panavision Primo SL10 has the largest aperture of the two lenses at 1.9 compared to the 3.1 aperture of Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1. This means that you get more light to your sensor using Panavision Primo SL10 wide open, and therefore it might be a better lens in dark situations.
Winner: Panavision Primo SL10
Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.
3. Focus Distance Comparison
Panavision Primo SL10 features a minimum focus distance of 61 cm while Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 has a minimum focus distance of 72 cm. Depending on your shooting style, the Panavision Primo SL10 might be a better choice.
Winner: Panavision Primo SL10
Regarding minimum focus distance: The minimum focus distance of a lens is the smallest distance from the lens to the subject you want to be in focus; subjects closer than the lens' minimum focus distance will not be in focus. Whether or not this is important to you is up for you to decide, but some want to take close photos and videos and in those cases it's important to have a lens with a low minimum focus distance.
4. Lens Type Comparison
The Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 is a Zoom lens while the Panavision Primo SL10 is a Prime lens. Whether or not a zoom lens or a prime lens is what you need, is up to you to decide; they both have their respective strengths and weaknesses.
Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 and Panavision Primo SL10:
| Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 | Panavision Primo SL10 | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Cooke | Panavision |
| Weight | 10300 g | 3000 g |
| Lens Mount | Missing | |
| Focal Length | 35 - 140 mm | 10 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 3.1 | 1.9 |
| Anamorphic | Yes | Missing |
| Anamorphic Squeeze Factor | 2 | Missing |
| Minimum Focus Distance | 72 cm | 61 cm |
| Type | Zoom | Prime |
| Aperture Range | 3.1 - 22 | Missing |
| Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread) | Missing | 116.3 mm |