Leica Elmar 135mm f/4.0 vs Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1
Leica Elmar 135mm f/4.0 vs Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1
When comparing Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 and Leica Elmar 135mm f/4.0, which one is better?
1. Lens Type Comparison
The Leica Elmar 135mm f/4.0 is a Prime lens while the Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 is a Zoom lens. Whether or not a zoom lens or a prime lens is what you need, is up to you to decide; they both have their respective strengths and weaknesses.
Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Leica Elmar 135mm f/4.0 and Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1:
| Leica Elmar 135mm f/4.0 | Cooke 35-140mm Anamorphic/i T3.1 | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Leica | Cooke |
| Weight | Missing | 10300 g |
| Lens Mount | Missing | |
| Focal Length | Missing | 35 - 140 mm |
| Largest Aperture | Missing | 3.1 |
| Anamorphic | Missing | Yes |
| Anamorphic Squeeze Factor | Missing | 2 |
| Minimum Focus Distance | Missing | 72 cm |
| Type | Prime | Zoom |
| Aperture Range | Missing | 3.1 - 22 |