Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX-II 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon F vs Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM

Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX-II 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon F

Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX-II 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon F

Price Check ➔

Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM

Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM

Price Check ➔



Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX-II 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon F vs Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM

When comparing Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM and Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX-II 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon F, which one is better?

1. Lens Weight Comparison

Regarding the weight of the lenses, Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX-II 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon F is the winner with a weight of 550 g compared to the 900 g that Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM weighs.

Winner: Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX-II 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon F

Regarding weight: The weight of a lens is something you need to consider, since you have to carry it around on the camera as long as you're shooting. It adds to the total weight of your camera and it's important to keep the weight low if you get tired in your arms when taking photographs or filming.

2. Lens Mount Comparison

The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX-II 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon F features a Nikon F Mount while the Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM features a Canon RF — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.

3. Largest Aperture Comparison

Both lenses share the same aperture of 2.8 — this means that you may buy both Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX-II 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon F and Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM in this regard; they''re the same.

Winner: Tied

Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.

4. Lens Type Comparison

Both lenses are Zoom lenses, which means that you can choose both Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX-II 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon F or Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM if you're looking for that type of lens.

Winner: Tied

Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.


Specifications

Full specifications table of Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX-II 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon F and Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM:

Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX-II 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon F Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX-II 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon FCanon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM

Price ➔

Price ➔

BrandTokinaCanon
Weight550 g900 g
Lens MountNikon F MountCanon RF
Focal Length11 - 16 mm24 - 70 mm
Largest Aperture2.82.8
AnamorphicMissingNo
Minimum Focus DistanceMissing21 cm
TypeZoomZoom
Aperture RangeMissing2.8 - 22
Filter Thread DiameterMissing82
Lens GroupsMissing15
Lens ElementsMissing12
Image StabilizationMissingYes
AutofocusMissingEvet
MacroMissingNo
Weather SealMissingYes
Full Frame CoverageMissingYes
Lens Hood IncludedMissingYes


Camera Verdict

This comparison of Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX-II 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon F and Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM was last updated on December 19, 2024.