Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM vs Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM

Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM

Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM

Price Check ➔

Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM

Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM

Price Check ➔



Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM vs Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM

When comparing Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM and Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM, which one is better?

1. Lens Mount Comparison

The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM features a Canon EF while the Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM features a Canon RF — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.

2. Largest Aperture Comparison

The Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM has the largest aperture of the two lenses at 2.8 compared to the 4.5 - 7.1 aperture of Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM. This means that you get more light to your sensor using Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM wide open, and therefore it might be a better lens in dark situations.

Winner: Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM

Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.

3. Anamorphic Comparison

Neither Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM or Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM are anamorphic lenses.

Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature

Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.

4. Lens Type Comparison

The Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM is a Prime lens while the Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM is a Zoom lens. Whether or not a zoom lens or a prime lens is what you need, is up to you to decide; they both have their respective strengths and weaknesses.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.


Specifications

Full specifications table of Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM and Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM:

Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM
Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STMCanon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM

Price ➔

Price ➔

BrandCanonCanon
WeightMissing1530 g
Lens MountCanon EFCanon RF
Focal Length40 mm100 - 500 mm
Largest Aperture2.84.5 - 7.1
AnamorphicNoNo
Minimum Focus DistanceMissing90 cm
TypePrimeZoom
Aperture RangeMissing4.5 - 54
Filter Thread DiameterMissing77
Aperture BladesMissing9
Lens GroupsMissing14
Lens ElementsMissing20
Image StabilizationMissingYes
AutofocusMissingEvet
Weather SealMissingYes
Full Frame CoverageMissingYes
Lens Hood IncludedMissingYes
Stabilization TypeMissingCanon Image Stabilizer (IS)


Camera Verdict

This comparison of Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM and Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM was last updated on December 19, 2024.