Sigma 50/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon) vs Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM
Sigma 50/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon) vs Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM
When comparing Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM and Sigma 50/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon), which one is better?
1. Lens Mount Comparison
These two lenses use the same lens mount, the Canon EF. This means that both lenses are compatible with cameras that use this mount.
Winner: Tied
Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.
2. Anamorphic Comparison
Neither Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM or Sigma 50/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon) are anamorphic lenses.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Sigma 50/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon) and Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM:
| Sigma 50/1,4 DG HSM Art (Canon) | Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Sigma | Canon |
| Lens Mount | Canon EF | Canon EF |
| Focal Length | Missing | 200 mm |
| Largest Aperture | Missing | 2.8 |
| Anamorphic | No | No |
| Type | Missing | Prime |
| Image Stabilization | Missing | No |
| Autofocus | Missing | Evet |
| Weather Seal | Missing | Yes |
| Full Frame Coverage | Missing | Yes |
| Lens Hood Included | Missing | Yes |