Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro

Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro

When comparing Fujifilm Fujinon XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro and Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM, which one is better?

1. Lens Mount Comparison

The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM features a Canon EF while the Fujifilm Fujinon XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro features a Fujifilm XF — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.

2. Largest Aperture Comparison

Both lenses share the same aperture of 2.8 — this means that you may buy both Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro in this regard; they''re the same.

Winner: Tied

Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.

3. Lens Type Comparison

Both lenses are Prime lenses, which means that you can choose both Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM or Fujifilm Fujinon XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro if you're looking for that type of lens.

Winner: Tied

Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.

4. Stabilization Comparison

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro features built-in image stabilization and Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM does not. Depending on your shooting style, this may be a heavy factor to choose Fujifilm Fujinon XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro instead of Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM.

Winner: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro

Regarding image stabilization: When a lens features built-in stabilization, it will actively help you hold the image steady by adjusting the optical elements inside the lens to compensate for movements. Do remember that lens stabilization is not required, but it may be suitable depending on your specific needs.

5. Autofocus Comparison

Both lenses have autofocus, which means that they're both great at focusing targets while taking photographs or filming video. Just remember, most cameras do not offer good autofocus while filming video.

Winner: Tied — both have this feature

Regarding autofocus: Lenses with autofocus help you focus when shooting pictures or video. If a lens only has manual focus it means that you have to focus manually by adjusting the focus wheel on the lens. Most cinema lenses do not use autofocus and are manual focus only.

Specifications

Full specifications table of Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM and Fujifilm Fujinon XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro:

	Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM	Fujifilm Fujinon XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro
	Price ➔	Price ➔
Brand	Canon	Fujifilm
Weight	Missing	750 g
Lens Mount	Canon EF	Fujifilm XF
Focal Length	200 mm	80 mm
Largest Aperture	2.8	2.8
Anamorphic	No	Missing
Minimum Focus Distance	Missing	25 cm
Type	Prime	Prime
Filter Thread Diameter	Missing	62
Aperture Blades	Missing	9
Lens Groups	Missing	12
Lens Elements	Missing	16
Image Stabilization	No	Yes
Autofocus	Evet	Evet
Macro	Missing	Yes
Weather Seal	Yes	Missing
Full Frame Coverage	Yes	Missing
Lens Hood Included	Yes	Yes
Stabilization Type	Missing	Fujifilm Optical Image Stabilization (OIS)