Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM vs Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art
Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM vs Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art
When comparing Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art and Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM, which one is better?
1. Lens Mount Comparison
These two lenses use the same lens mount, the Canon EF. This means that both lenses are compatible with cameras that use this mount.
Winner: Tied
Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.
2. Largest Aperture Comparison
The Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM has the largest aperture of the two lenses at 2 compared to the 2.8 aperture of Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art. This means that you get more light to your sensor using Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM wide open, and therefore it might be a better lens in dark situations.
Winner: Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM
Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.
3. Lens Type Comparison
Both lenses are Prime lenses, which means that you can choose both Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM or Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art if you're looking for that type of lens.
Winner: Tied
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
4. Macro Comparison
Res
Winner: Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art
Regarding macro: Macro lenses can focus much closer to your subjects and might be suitable when photographing flowers, insects, wildlife and nature.
5. Full Frame Comparison
Both Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art and Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM cover a full frame sensor and can be used on full frame cameras as well as cameras with smaller sensors.
Winner: Tied — both have this feature
Regarding full frame coverage: All lenses do not cover full frame sensors, but not all cameras are full frame cameras either. If a lens covers a full frame sensor it can be used on all cameras with a matching lens mount, both full frame and crop sensors, except for medium format cameras.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM and Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art:
| Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM | Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Art | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Canon | Sigma |
| Lens Mount | Canon EF | Canon EF |
| Focal Length | 135 mm | 70 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2 | 2.8 |
| Anamorphic | No | Missing |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Image Stabilization | No | Missing |
| Autofocus | Evet | Missing |
| Macro | No | Yes |
| Weather Seal | Yes | Missing |
| Full Frame Coverage | Yes | Yes |
| Lens Hood Included | Yes | Missing |