Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 vs Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM
Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 vs Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM
When comparing Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM and Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0, which one is better?
1. Largest Aperture Comparison
Both lenses share the same aperture of 2 — this means that you may buy both Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 and Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM in this regard; they''re the same.
Winner: Tied
Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.
2. Lens Type Comparison
Both lenses are Prime lenses, which means that you can choose both Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 or Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM if you're looking for that type of lens.
Winner: Tied
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 and Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM:
| Cooke S4/i 35mm T2.0 | Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Cooke | Canon |
| Weight | 1900 g | Missing |
| Lens Mount | Missing | Canon EF |
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 135 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2 | 2 |
| Anamorphic | Missing | No |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Aperture Range | 2 - 22 | Missing |
| Image Stabilization | Missing | No |
| Autofocus | Missing | Evet |
| Macro | Missing | No |
| Weather Seal | Missing | Yes |
| Full Frame Coverage | Missing | Yes |
| Lens Hood Included | Missing | Yes |