Canon CN-E 30-300mm T2.95-3.7 L S vs Canon RF 15-35/2.8 L IS USM
Canon CN-E 30-300mm T2.95-3.7 L S vs Canon RF 15-35/2.8 L IS USM
When comparing Canon RF 15-35/2.8 L IS USM and Canon CN-E 30-300mm T2.95-3.7 L S, which one is better?
1. Lens Mount Comparison
The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Canon CN-E 30-300mm T2.95-3.7 L S features a Canon EF while the Canon RF 15-35/2.8 L IS USM features a Canon RF — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.
Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear
Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.
2. Lens Type Comparison
Both lenses are Zoom lenses, which means that you can choose both Canon CN-E 30-300mm T2.95-3.7 L S or Canon RF 15-35/2.8 L IS USM if you're looking for that type of lens.
Winner: Tied
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Canon CN-E 30-300mm T2.95-3.7 L S and Canon RF 15-35/2.8 L IS USM:
| Canon CN-E 30-300mm T2.95-3.7 L S | Canon RF 15-35/2.8 L IS USM | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Canon | Canon |
| Lens Mount | Canon EF | Canon RF |
| Focal Length | 30 - 300 mm | Missing |
| Largest Aperture | 2.95 - 3.7 | Missing |
| Anamorphic | Missing | No |
| Type | Zoom | Zoom |
| Image Stabilization | No | Missing |
| Parfocal | Yes | Missing |
| Autofocus | Hayır | Missing |
| Macro | No | Missing |