Canon CN-E 14mm T3.1 L F vs Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM

Canon CN-E 14mm T3.1 L F

Canon CN-E 14mm T3.1 L F

Price Check ➔

Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM

Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM

Price Check ➔



Canon CN-E 14mm T3.1 L F vs Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM

When comparing Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM and Canon CN-E 14mm T3.1 L F, which one is better?

1. Largest Aperture Comparison

The Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM has the largest aperture of the two lenses at 2.8 compared to the 3.1 aperture of Canon CN-E 14mm T3.1 L F. This means that you get more light to your sensor using Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM wide open, and therefore it might be a better lens in dark situations.

Winner: Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM

Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.


Specifications

Full specifications table of Canon CN-E 14mm T3.1 L F and Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM:

Canon CN-E 14mm T3.1 L F Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM
Canon CN-E 14mm T3.1 L FCanon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM

Price ➔

Price ➔

BrandCanonCanon
Lens MountMissingCanon EF
Focal Length14 mm200 mm
Largest Aperture3.12.8
AnamorphicMissingNo
TypeMissingPrime
Image StabilizationMissingNo
AutofocusMissingEvet
Weather SealMissingYes
Full Frame CoverageMissingYes
Lens Hood IncludedMissingYes


Camera Verdict

This comparison of Canon CN-E 14mm T3.1 L F and Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM was last updated on December 19, 2024.