Canon 7-63mm T2.6 vs Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM

Canon 7-63mm T2.6

Canon 7-63mm T2.6

Price Check ➔

Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM

Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM

Price Check ➔



Canon 7-63mm T2.6 vs Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM

When comparing Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM and Canon 7-63mm T2.6, which one is better?

1. Lens Mount Comparison

The lenses each feature different lens mounts — the Canon 7-63mm T2.6 features a Arri PL Mount while the Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM features a Canon EF — and because of this the preference varies. If you have a compatible camera, then of course that lens will be a better choice for you.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.

2. Largest Aperture Comparison

The Canon 7-63mm T2.6 has the largest aperture of the two lenses at 2.6 compared to the 2.8 aperture of Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM. This means that you get more light to your sensor using Canon 7-63mm T2.6 wide open, and therefore it might be a better lens in dark situations.

Winner: Canon 7-63mm T2.6

Regarding largest aperture: A lower aperture number means that the widest aperture on the lens is larger. This means that more light will hit the sensor and also that the depth of field will be shallower, better separating your subject from the background.

3. Lens Type Comparison

The Canon 7-63mm T2.6 is a Zoom lens while the Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM is a Prime lens. Whether or not a zoom lens or a prime lens is what you need, is up to you to decide; they both have their respective strengths and weaknesses.

Winner: Tied — It depends on your gear

Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.


Specifications

Full specifications table of Canon 7-63mm T2.6 and Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM:

Canon 7-63mm T2.6 Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM
Canon 7-63mm T2.6Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM

Price ➔

Price ➔

BrandCanonCanon
Weight1980 gMissing
Lens MountArri PL MountCanon EF
Focal Length7 - 63 mm200 mm
Largest Aperture2.62.8
AnamorphicMissingNo
Minimum Focus Distance60 cmMissing
TypeZoomPrime
Aperture Range2.6 - 22Missing
Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread)95 mmMissing
Image StabilizationMissingNo
AutofocusMissingEvet
Weather SealMissingYes
Full Frame CoverageMissingYes
Lens Hood IncludedMissingYes


Camera Verdict

This comparison of Canon 7-63mm T2.6 and Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM was last updated on December 19, 2024.