Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x vs Blazar 85mm T2.9 1.8X Anamorphic
Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x vs Blazar 85mm T2.9 1.8X Anamorphic
When comparing Blazar 85mm T2.9 1.8X Anamorphic and Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x, which one is better?
1. Lens Mount Comparison
These two lenses use the same lens mount, the Arri PL Mount. This means that both lenses are compatible with cameras that use this mount.
Winner: Tied
Regarding lens mount: Popular lens mounts are Canon RF and EF, Micro Four Thirds and Nikon Z. Different lens mounts lets you connect different lenses to camera bodies, but some might not be compatible. This can be helped by using an adapter, like a Canon EF to RF adapter.
2. Anamorphic Comparison
Both Blazar 85mm T2.9 1.8X Anamorphic and Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x are anamorphic lenses.
Winner: Tied — both have this feature
Regarding anamorphic: Anamorphic lenses are usually used on cinema cameras and squeezes the image when its recorded, which gives the final, stretched out, image oval bokeh and a different angle of view. The most common lenses, however, are not anamorphic but spherical, which gives a spherical bokeh and is a much cheaper lens design.
3. Lens Type Comparison
Both lenses are Prime lenses, which means that you can choose both Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x or Blazar 85mm T2.9 1.8X Anamorphic if you're looking for that type of lens.
Winner: Tied
Regarding type: There are two types of lenses; zoom lenses and prime lenses. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length and cannot be zoomed, while zoom lenses have a focal length range and can be zoomed in to get closer to the subject. Prime lenses are usually lighter, cheaper and let in more light. Zoom lenses are more versatile but are more expensive since they require a more advanced lens design.
4. Stabilization Comparison
Neither Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x or Blazar 85mm T2.9 1.8X Anamorphic feature built-in image stabilization.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding image stabilization: When a lens features built-in stabilization, it will actively help you hold the image steady by adjusting the optical elements inside the lens to compensate for movements. Do remember that lens stabilization is not required, but it may be suitable depending on your specific needs.
5. Autofocus Comparison
None of the lenses have an autofocus feature, which means that both lenses are manual focus lenses.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding autofocus: Lenses with autofocus help you focus when shooting pictures or video. If a lens only has manual focus it means that you have to focus manually by adjusting the focus wheel on the lens. Most cinema lenses do not use autofocus and are manual focus only.
6. Macro Comparison
Neither Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x or Blazar 85mm T2.9 1.8X Anamorphic are macro lenses.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding macro: Macro lenses can focus much closer to your subjects and might be suitable when photographing flowers, insects, wildlife and nature.
7. Weather Seal Comparison
Neither Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x or Blazar 85mm T2.9 1.8X Anamorphic feature a weather sealed design. If you need a weather sealed lens, you might want to look further.
Winner: Tied — Neither have this feature
Regarding weather seal: A lens that is weather sealed will perform better over time if you're using the lens in harsh conditions where it's wet or dusty. It may not matter if you're merely using your lens in a studio or in your home.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x and Blazar 85mm T2.9 1.8X Anamorphic:
| Atlas Orion 25mm T2 2x | Blazar 85mm T2.9 1.8X Anamorphic | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Atlas Lens Co. | Blazar |
| Lens Mount | Arri PL Mount | Arri PL Mount |
| Focal Length | 25 mm | Missing |
| Largest Aperture | 2 | Missing |
| Anamorphic | Yes | Yes |
| Anamorphic Squeeze Factor | 2 | 1.8 |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Autofocus | Hayır | Hayır |
| Macro | No | No |
| Weather Seal | No | No |
| Full Frame Coverage | Missing | Yes |
| Lens Hood Included | Missing | No |