Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 vs Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM
Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 vs Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM
When comparing Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM and Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8, which one is better?
1. Compare weight
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM which weighs 680 g, compared to the loser Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 which weighs 2000 g.
Winner: Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
2. Compare minimum focusing distance
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 28 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 35 cm for Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8.
Winner: Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Specifications
Full specifications table of Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 and Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM:
| Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 | Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Zeiss | Sony |
| Weight | 2000 g | 680 g |
| Mount | Missing | Sony E |
| Focal Length | 8 mm | 16 - 35 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| Anamorphic Lens | Missing | No |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 35 cm | 28 cm |
| Type | Prime | Zoom |
| Filter Thread | Missing | 82 |
| Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread) | 134 mm | Missing |
| Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Missing | Yes |