When comparing Sigma 90mm f/2.8 DG DN Contemporary (Sony E) and Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8, which one is better?
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sigma 90mm f/2.8 DG DN Contemporary - (Sony E) which weighs 295 g, compared to the loser Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 which weighs 2000 g.
Winner: Sigma 90mm f/2.8 DG DN Contemporary (Sony E)
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 35 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 50 cm for Sigma 90mm f/2.8 DG DN Contemporary - (Sony E).
Winner: Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Full specifications table of Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 and Sigma 90mm f/2.8 DG DN Contemporary (Sony E):
Zeiss Ultra Prime 8R T2.8 | Sigma 90mm f/2.8 DG DN Contemporary - (Sony E) | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Brand | Zeiss | Sigma |
Weight | 2000 g | 295 g |
Mount | Missing | Sony E |
Focal Length | 8 mm | 90 mm |
Largest Aperture | 2.8 | 2.8 |
Anamorphic Lens | Missing | No |
Minimum Focusing Distance | 35 cm | 50 cm |
Type | Prime | Prime |
Filter Thread | Missing | 55 |
Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread) | 134 mm | Missing |
Stabilization | Missing | No |
Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Missing | Yes |