Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA vs Sony FE 40mm F2.5 G
Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA vs Sony FE 40mm F2.5 G
When comparing Sony FE 40mm F2.5 G and Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA, which one is better?
1. Compare weight
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sony FE 40mm F2.5 G which weighs 173 g, compared to the loser Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA which weighs 281 g.
Winner: Sony FE 40mm F2.5 G
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
2. Compare minimum focusing distance
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Sony FE 40mm F2.5 G is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 28 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 50 cm for Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA.
Winner: Sony FE 40mm F2.5 G
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Specifications
Full specifications table of Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA and Sony FE 40mm F2.5 G:
| Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA | Sony FE 40mm F2.5 G | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Zeiss | Sony |
| Weight | 281 g | 173 g |
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Focal Length | 55 mm | 40 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 1.8 | 2.5 |
| Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 50 cm | 28 cm |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Filter Thread | Missing | 49 |
| Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread) | 49 mm | Missing |
| Stabilization | Missing | No |
| Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Missing | Yes |