Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF vs Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA

Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF vs Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA

When comparing Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA and Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF, which one is better?

1. Compare weight

The lens that weighs the least of the two is Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA which weighs 281 g, compared to the loser Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF which weighs 361 g.

Winner: Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA

Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.

2. Compare minimum focusing distance

When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 24 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 50 cm for Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA.

Winner: Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF

Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).

Specifications

Full specifications table of Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF and Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA:

	Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF	Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA
	Price ➔	Price ➔
Brand	Zeiss	Zeiss
Weight	361 g	281 g
Mount	Sony E	Sony E
Focal Length	40 mm	55 mm
Largest Aperture	2	1.8
Anamorphic Lens	No	No
Minimum Focusing Distance	24 cm	50 cm
Type	Prime	Prime
Filter Thread	67	Missing
Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread)	Missing	49 mm
Stabilization	No	Missing
Covers a Full Frame Sensor?	Yes	Missing