When comparing Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA and Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF, which one is better?
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA which weighs 281 g, compared to the loser Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF which weighs 361 g.
Winner: Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 24 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 50 cm for Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA.
Winner: Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Full specifications table of Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF and Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA:
Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF | Zeiss Sonnar T* E 55 mm f1,8 ZA | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Brand | Zeiss | Zeiss |
Weight | 361 g | 281 g |
Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
Focal Length | 40 mm | 55 mm |
Largest Aperture | 2 | 1.8 |
Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
Minimum Focusing Distance | 24 cm | 50 cm |
Type | Prime | Prime |
Filter Thread | 67 | Missing |
Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread) | Missing | 49 mm |
Stabilization | No | Missing |
Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Yes | Missing |