Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF vs Sigma 105 mm f/1,4 DG HSM Art Sony

Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF vs Sigma 105 mm f/1,4 DG HSM Art Sony

When comparing Sigma 105 mm f/1,4 DG HSM Art Sony and Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF, which one is better?

1. Compare weight

The lens that weighs the least of the two is Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF which weighs 361 g, compared to the loser Sigma 105 mm f/1,4 DG HSM Art - Sony which weighs 1645 g.

Winner: Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF

Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.

2. Compare minimum focusing distance

When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 24 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 100 cm for Sigma 105 mm f/1,4 DG HSM Art - Sony.

Winner: Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF

Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).

Specifications

Full specifications table of Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF and Sigma 105 mm f/1,4 DG HSM Art Sony:

	Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF	Sigma 105 mm f/1,4 DG HSM Art - Sony
	Price ➔	Price ➔
Brand	Zeiss	Sigma
Weight	361 g	1645 g
Mount	Sony E	Sony E
Focal Length	40 mm	105 mm
Largest Aperture	2	1.4
Anamorphic Lens	No	No
Minimum Focusing Distance	24 cm	100 cm
Type	Prime	Prime
Filter Thread	67	Missing
Stabilization	No	No
Covers a Full Frame Sensor?	Yes	Yes