When comparing Sigma 100-400/5-6,3 DG DN OS Sony E and Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF, which one is better?
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF which weighs 361 g, compared to the loser Sigma 100-400/5-6,3 DG DN OS Contemporary - Sony E which weighs 1160 g.
Winner: Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 24 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 112 cm for Sigma 100-400/5-6,3 DG DN OS Contemporary - Sony E.
Winner: Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Full specifications table of Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF and Sigma 100-400/5-6,3 DG DN OS Sony E:
Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF | Sigma 100-400/5-6,3 DG DN OS Contemporary - Sony E | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Brand | Zeiss | Sigma |
Weight | 361 g | 1160 g |
Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
Focal Length | 40 mm | 100 - 400 mm |
Largest Aperture | 2 | 5 - 6.3 |
Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
Minimum Focusing Distance | 24 cm | 112 cm |
Type | Prime | Zoom |
Filter Thread | 67 | 67 |
Stabilization | No | Yes |
Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Yes | Yes |
Stabilization Type | Missing | Sigma Optical Stabilizer (OS) |