When comparing Canon RF 135mm F1.8L IS USM and Zeiss Batis 1.8/85, which one is better?
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Zeiss Batis 1.8/85 which weighs 452 g, compared to the loser Canon RF 135mm F1.8L IS USM which weighs 935 g.
Winner: Zeiss Batis 1.8/85
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Canon RF 135mm F1.8L IS USM is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 70 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 80 cm for Zeiss Batis 1.8/85.
Winner: Canon RF 135mm F1.8L IS USM
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Full specifications table of Zeiss Batis 1.8/85 and Canon RF 135mm F1.8L IS USM:
Zeiss Batis 1.8/85 | Canon RF 135mm F1.8L IS USM | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Brand | Zeiss | Canon |
Weight | 452 g | 935 g |
Mount | Sony E | Canon RF |
Focal Length | 85 mm | 135 mm |
Largest Aperture | 1.8 | 1.8 |
Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
Minimum Focusing Distance | 80 cm | 70 cm |
Type | Prime | Prime |
Filter Thread | 67 | 82 |
Stabilization | No | Yes |
Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Yes | Yes |