When comparing Sony FE 70-200mm f2.8 GM OSS II and Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom), which one is better?
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sony FE 70-200mm f2.8 GM OSS II which weighs 1045 g, compared to the loser Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom) which weighs 5800 g.
Winner: Sony FE 70-200mm f2.8 GM OSS II
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Sony FE 70-200mm f2.8 GM OSS II is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 40 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 175.3 cm for Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom).
Winner: Sony FE 70-200mm f2.8 GM OSS II
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Full specifications table of Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom) and Sony FE 70-200mm f2.8 GM OSS II:
Panavision ATZ (Anamorphic Tele Zoom) | Sony FE 70-200mm f2.8 GM OSS II | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Brand | Panavision | Sony |
Weight | 5800 g | 1045 g |
Mount | Missing | Sony E |
Focal Length | 70 - 200 mm | 70 - 200 mm |
Largest Aperture | 3.5 | 2.8 |
Anamorphic Lens | Yes | No |
Minimum Focusing Distance | 175.3 cm | 40 cm |
Type | Zoom | Zoom |
Filter Thread | Missing | 77 |
Stabilization | Missing | Yes |
Parfocal | Missing | Yes |
Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Missing | Yes |
Stabilization Type | Missing | Sony Optical SteadyShot (OSS) |