Sony FE 35mm f/1.8 vs Canon RF 135mm F1.8L IS USM
Sony FE 35mm f/1.8 vs Canon RF 135mm F1.8L IS USM
When comparing Canon RF 135mm F1.8L IS USM and Sony FE 35mm f/1.8, which one is better?
1. Compare weight
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sony FE 35mm f/1.8 which weighs 281 g, compared to the loser Canon RF 135mm F1.8L IS USM which weighs 935 g.
Winner: Sony FE 35mm f/1.8
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
2. Compare minimum focusing distance
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Sony FE 35mm f/1.8 is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 22.1 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 70 cm for Canon RF 135mm F1.8L IS USM.
Winner: Sony FE 35mm f/1.8
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Specifications
Full specifications table of Sony FE 35mm f/1.8 and Canon RF 135mm F1.8L IS USM:
| Sony FE 35mm f/1.8 | Canon RF 135mm F1.8L IS USM | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Sony | Canon |
| Weight | 281 g | 935 g |
| Mount | Sony E | Canon RF |
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 135 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 22.1 cm | 70 cm |
| Type | Prime | Prime |
| Filter Thread | 55 | 82 |
| Stabilization | No | Yes |
| Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Missing | Yes |