When comparing Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS and Sony FE 400 mm f2,8 GM OSS, which one is better?
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS which weighs 1470 g, compared to the loser Sony FE 400 mm f2,8 GM OSS which weighs 2895 g.
Winner: Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 200 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 270 cm for Sony FE 400 mm f2,8 GM OSS.
Winner: Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Full specifications table of Sony FE 400 mm f2,8 GM OSS and Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS:
Sony FE 400 mm f2,8 GM OSS | Sony FE 300mm f/2,8 GM OSS | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Brand | Sony | Sony |
Year | 2018 | Missing |
Weight | 2895 g | 1470 g |
Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
Focal Length | 400 mm | 300 mm |
Largest Aperture | 2.8 | 2.8 |
Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
Minimum Focusing Distance | 270 cm | 200 cm |
Type | Prime | Prime |
Filter Thread | 40.5 | Missing |
Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Yes | Yes |
Stabilization Type | Sony Optical SteadyShot (OSS) | Sony Optical SteadyShot (OSS) |