When comparing Sony FE 24-105 mm f/4 G OSS and Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF, which one is better?
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF which weighs 361 g, compared to the loser Sony FE 24-105 mm f/4 G OSS which weighs 663 g.
Winner: Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 24 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 38 cm for Sony FE 24-105 mm f/4 G OSS.
Winner: Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Full specifications table of Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF and Sony FE 24-105 mm f/4 G OSS:
Zeiss Batis Distagon 2/40 CF | Sony FE 24-105 mm f/4 G OSS | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Brand | Zeiss | Sony |
Weight | 361 g | 663 g |
Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
Focal Length | 40 mm | 24 - 105 mm |
Largest Aperture | 2 | 4 |
Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
Minimum Focusing Distance | 24 cm | 38 cm |
Type | Prime | Zoom |
Filter Thread | 67 | 77 |
Stabilization | No | Yes |
Parfocal | Missing | Yes |
Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Yes | Yes |
Stabilization Type | Missing | Sony Optical SteadyShot (OSS) |