When comparing Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G and Sony FE 24-105 mm f/4 G OSS, which one is better?
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sony FE 24-105 mm f/4 G OSS which weighs 663 g, compared to the loser Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G which weighs 1390 g.
Winner: Sony FE 24-105 mm f/4 G OSS
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 28 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 38 cm for Sony FE 24-105 mm f/4 G OSS.
Winner: Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Full specifications table of Sony FE 24-105 mm f/4 G OSS and Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G:
Sony FE 24-105 mm f/4 G OSS | Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Brand | Sony | Sony |
Weight | 663 g | 1390 g |
Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
Focal Length | 24 - 105 mm | 16 - 35 mm |
Largest Aperture | 4 | 3.1 |
Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
Minimum Focusing Distance | 38 cm | 28 cm |
Type | Zoom | Zoom |
Filter Thread | 77 | Missing |
Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread) | Missing | 114 mm |
Stabilization | Yes | No |
Parfocal | Yes | Yes |
Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Yes | Yes |
Stabilization Type | Sony Optical SteadyShot (OSS) | Missing |