Sony FE 200-600 mm f5.6-6.3 G OSS vs Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G
Sony FE 200-600 mm f5.6-6.3 G OSS vs Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G
When comparing Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G and Sony FE 200-600 mm f5.6-6.3 G OSS, which one is better?
1. Compare weight
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G which weighs 1390 g, compared to the loser Sony FE 200-600 mm f5.6-6.3 G OSS which weighs 2115 g.
Winner: Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
Specifications
Full specifications table of Sony FE 200-600 mm f5.6-6.3 G OSS and Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G:
| Sony FE 200-600 mm f5.6-6.3 G OSS | Sony FE C 16–35mm T3.1 G | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Sony | Sony |
| Weight | 2115 g | 1390 g |
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Focal Length | 200 - 600 mm | 16 - 35 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 5.6 - 6.3 | 3.1 |
| Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | Missing | 28 cm |
| Type | Zoom | Zoom |
| Lens Front Diameter (Not Filter Thread) | Missing | 114 mm |
| Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Parfocal | Missing | Yes |
| Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilization Type | Sony Optical SteadyShot (OSS) | Missing |