Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM vs Sigma 24mm 1.4 DG DN Art Sony E
Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM vs Sigma 24mm 1.4 DG DN Art Sony E
When comparing Sigma 24mm 1.4 DG DN Art Sony E and Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM, which one is better?
1. Compare weight
The lens that weighs the least of the two is Sigma 24mm 1.4 DG DN Art - Sony E which weighs 510 g, compared to the loser Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM which weighs 680 g.
Winner: Sigma 24mm 1.4 DG DN Art Sony E
Regarding weight: When it comes to the lens's weight, it's actually more important than many people think that the lens weighs as little as possible — it's simply a pain to lug around a lens that's too heavy when you're photographing or filming for several hours, and a few hundred grams can make a real difference.
2. Compare minimum focusing distance
When it comes to minimum focusing distance, that is how close to the subject the lens can focus, Sigma 24mm 1.4 DG DN Art - Sony E is the winner with a minimum focusing distance of 25 cm. This can be compared with the minimum focusing distance of 28 cm for Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM.
Winner: Sigma 24mm 1.4 DG DN Art Sony E
Regarding minimum focusing distance: The lens's minimum focusing distance determines how close you can photograph your subject, such as a face or an animal. If the minimum focusing distance is 50 cm then you cannot get closer to your subject than 50 cm. Macro lenses often have a very low minimum focusing distance so that you can take close-up shots (macro photography).
Specifications
Full specifications table of Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM and Sigma 24mm 1.4 DG DN Art Sony E:
| Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM | Sigma 24mm 1.4 DG DN Art - Sony E | |
 |  | |
| Brand | Sony | Sigma |
| Weight | 680 g | 510 g |
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Focal Length | 16 - 35 mm | 24 mm |
| Largest Aperture | 2.8 | 1.4 |
| Anamorphic Lens | No | No |
| Minimum Focusing Distance | 28 cm | 25 cm |
| Type | Zoom | Prime |
| Filter Thread | 82 | 72 |
| Stabilization | Missing | No |
| Covers a Full Frame Sensor? | Yes | Yes |